Skip to content Skip to navigation

Endoscopic vs. open surgery for treating large, locally advanced juvenile angiofibromas: A comparison of local control and morbidity outcomes

| Reprints
November 22, 2011
by Hossam Bosraty, MD, Ahmed Atef, MD, and Mossad Aziz, MD


Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma is a combined vascular and fibrous neoplasm that most commonly affects prepubertal and adolescent boys. These tumors have traditionally been managed with open surgery, but interest in endoscopic resection-particularly for small tumors-has increased in recent years. To the best of our knowledge, no comparative study of open and endoscopic approaches for treating large, locally advanced tumors has been previously published in the literature. We conducted a retrospective study of 42 males, aged 6 to 21 years (mean: 13 ± 2.1), who had been treated for histologically proven and locally advanced juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma with either open surgery (n = 29) or endoscopic excision (n = 13). Our two primary outcomes measures were local control and surgical morbidity. We found that the endoscopic approach was as good as or better than open approaches for patients with large tumors.

ENT Journal provides full text articles to our registered members.
Please log in or sign up for a FREE membership to view the full content:

You may also like to: